Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Media Law Test 1

For those of you who have misplaced your test....here it is. For students in Kingsville, it is due Friday. For Brent in San Antonio, it is due Monday. Students in Kingsville please turn in a hard copy in class. Brent...email or blog..your call...thanks

Media Law Test No. 1

Name_____________________Grade_____Date_______

I. Multiple Choice: Please circle the correct answer and mark the letter you selected on the space provided beneath each multiple choice question. Please be neat. Each is worth 1 point.

1. Media Law is largely based on:
a. the constitution, b. common law, c. state law, d. court decisions.
____

2. The highest ranking court in the land is the:
a. Texas State Supreme Court, b. The Supreme Court, c. 9th Court of Appeals, d. 999th District Court.
____

3. The Court that ranks right below the highest ranking court in the land when it comes to federal cases or federal matters is:
a. the Appellate Court System b. The U.S. Customs Court, c. The U.S. Court of Appeals, d. The Texas Court of Criminal, Civil and Drug Appeals.
____

4. U.S. District Courts are referred to as:
a. unconstitutional, b. common law courts , c. trial courts, d. appellate courts.
____

5. U.S. Courts of Appeals are referred to as:
a. unconstitutional, b. common law courts , c. circuit courts, d. appellate courts.
____

6. The number of justices in the U.S. Supreme Court is:
a. 3, b. 5 , c. 7, d. 9, e. 12
____

7. All of the following are identified as “types of law” in your text except:
a. Constitutional Law, b. Common Law , c Statutory Law, d. Administrative Law, e. Criminal Law, f. Civil Law, g. Court Law.
____

8. Common Law developed out of:
a. Ordinary court decisions that kept happening over and over and over again, b. the English Court system through the years , c. a combination of American, Texas, Spanish and Mexican court decisions d. circumstances surrounding the Law West of the Pecos and truly very common.
____

9. In criminal law proceedings of guilt must be proved:
a. beyond a reasonable doubt, b. the vast preponderance of evidence presented, c. by showing a weapon that committed the crime and a body of the dead person, d. before the case goes to trial.
____

10. In civil law proceedings of guilt must be proved:
a. beyond a reasonable doubt, b. the vast preponderance of evidence presented, c. by showing a weapon that committed the crime and a body of the dead person, d. before the case goes to trial.
____

11. A current piece of legislation that was renewed by Congress in 2006 has cut into our country’s legacy of freedom, according to some experts, is:
a. The Freedom of Information Act, b. The Texas Open Meetings and Records Act, c. The 10 Percent Rule of Education, d. The USA PATRIOT Act.
____

12. English philosopher John Milton was one of the first advocates for freedom of expression. He is famous for his worked titled:
a. The Federalist Papers, b. Areopagitica, c. The Bill of Rights, d. Aerodynamics.
____

13. John Locke was also an early advocate for freedom of expression for the people and he said that government should serve the people, and not the other way around, presented the following idea when it comes to freedom:
a. The Marketplace of Ideas, b. The Social Contract With The People, c. The Bill of Rights, d. We The People, in Order to. . . . .
___

14. Among of the earliest forms of limiting freedom of expression used by primarily by British rulers was:
a. Licensing, b. Published by Authority, c. E Pluribus Unum, d. Seditious Libel, e. A, B and C are correct, f. None of the Above.
____


15. The First Amendment gave our country freedom of expression and freedom of the press. The first challenge to this First Amendment:
a. Did not occur until President George Bush and his administration authored the USA PATRIOT Act in 2000, b. Came when James Franklin was jailed, forcing Ben Franklin to take over his brother’s printing press and newspaper in 1712, c. When John Peter Zenger was jailed for seditious libel by Gov. William Cosby of New York in 1734, d. When Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798.
____


16. In our country, laws that prohibited the distribution of newspapers and other material advocating the abolition of slavery were known as:
a. Patriot Laws, b. Gag Laws, c. by showing a weapon that committed the crime and a body of the dead person, d. before the case goes to trial.
____

17. The Smith Act, an attachment to the Alien Registration Act of 1940, made it a crime to:
a. Enter the United States illegally, especially if you were from a Latin American Country, b. advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government by force, c. proselytize for groups asking for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government, d. refuse to enlist in the military and go fight in the coming World War II, e. both b and c are correct, f. none of the above.
____

18. After the most recent Supreme Court rulings, “cross burning” and “hate speech” are:
a. Still considered crimes against our country and humanity, b. ruled to be out of order by the Political Correctness Committee of the United States Senate, c. protected by the First Amendment, d. going to be added to the Bill of Rights as soon as possible.
____

19. In our country, the sidewalks and streets are considered to:
a. places of public access and can be used by protestors, b. be on private or city property and can not be used to hold protest rallies, c. be the right place and the right time to arrest those who feel they have a right to protest issues in our country, d. be the best in the world, thank God.
____



20. In our country, the media:
a. can publish confidential information on people, especially when it is
obtained legally, b. must abide by laws prohibiting the publication of
confidential information, c. respect the privacy of all, even in public places, d. is considered an enemy of the state.
____

21. In our country, prior restraint would be legal if the government:
a. got to the newspaper or television station prior to deadline and confiscated all the tapes and/or notes or photographs, b. can show that the journalists involved are members of the Communist Party and not loyal to the United States, c. can prove that irreparable harm to national security would otherwise occur, d. has people with “guts” to stop such nonsense.
____

22. Speaking of prior restraint, a good working definition of the term is:
a. an act of self defense against those who would overturn the American way of life, b. an act of political defiance against those who speak badly about our president and his associates, like Dick Cheney, et. al., c. what all good lawyers must learn to defend if they expect to work in U.S. government cases, d. an act of government censorship to prevent facts or ideas that the government considers unacceptable from being disseminated.
____

23. In recent years, when it comes to libel and slander by the media:
a. the differences between the two are less important, as a result of several Supreme Court decision and the growing influence of the electronic media, b. the term libel is often use (even in our textbook) when referring to both types of defamation, c. both a and b are correct, d. none of the above.
____


24. Which of the following is not considered to an element of libel?
a. Defamation, b. Identification, c. Restraint, d. Dissemination,
e. Communication, f. Fault, g. Damages.
____

25. There are several defenses of libel that have been developed under Common Law and have been recognized for years. Those include all but which of the following?
a. Truth, b. Privilege, c. Identification, d. Fair Comment and Criticism.


26. The first step in analyzing any potential libelous item is to determine whether there is:
a. money to be made from this lawsuit, b. a plaintiff who may sue for libel, c. an attorney who will take the case, d. an action which is against our current president’s will and determination.
____

27. In our country, which of the following may not sue for libel?
a. A living person, b. a corporation c. an unincorporated business, d. heirs of a deceased person who was wronged and libeled by the media, e. government agencies, f. all of the above, g. only “d” and “e”.
____

28. In a libel suit, the burden of proof lies with:
a. the media organization that is being sued, b. the plaintiff, c. the U.S. Court of Appeals, d. the defendant.
____

29. There are different rules of libel for public figures (public officials) and private persons. The most noticeable of these difference is that:
a. those who thrust themselves in the public stage or are public officials must prove that there was “actual malice” involved in the publication of the libel, b. those who thrust themselves in the public stage or are public officials must prove only damages, c. those who thrust themselves in the public stage or are public officials must prove that their reputation has been harmed beyond redemption, d. private persons won’t even sue, cause if they do, they thrust themselves in the public forum and then they can’t sue for libel, because they become public figures, and they probably won’t win their lawsuit, anyway, and it’s a waste of time.
____

30. In many states, publishing a timely retraction – as prominently as the original libel claimed by the plaintiff – limits the plaintiff:
a. and his/her lawyers to stick to the facts, just the facts, b. special damages (i.e. provable monetary losses), c. to proving he is not a public figure, d. to using only actual malice as a matter of law.
____





31. In a “Right of Privacy” suit, when it comes to intrusion, this is possible when one party intentionally intrudes in to another’s seclusion or solitude in a manner that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. This would include all of the following news gathering or surveillance elements except:
a. downloading information from MySpace that is readily available to all ,
b. eavesdropping,
c. electronic surveillance,
d. photographing someone using a high-power telephoto lens.
____

32. In order to win a lawsuit for publicity to private facts, the plaintiff must prove all but which of the following?
a. The facts were private, b. The disclosure is highly offensive, especially to a reasonable person, c. The information was of no legitimate public concern and was not newsworthy, d. Not even the family was aware of those private facts, but some friends were.
____

33. Misappropriation is tied to a person’s “Right to Publicity” in most states. That means that:
a. a person can do all those crazy things people do on MySpace and YouTube and not worry about being sued or suing someone if they pick up the video, b. a person has the right to call a press conference whenever, wherever and whatever time, c. those who use a person’s name, voice, photograph or any other element of his/her public persona for a commercial purpose must have consent, d. a person cannot be embarrassed for his or her action before being consulted and giving consent.
____

34. The U.S. Supreme Court has made it clear that:
a. Legally obscene material is protected by the First Amendment and may not be suppressed by local, state or federal authorities,
b. Legally obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment and may be suppressed by local, state or federal authorities under special circumstances
c. books like Sally Mann’s “Immediate Family,” the provocative class “Memoirs”, e.g. “Fanny Hill” and Madonna’s “Sex” are sexually explicit and should be banned,
d. d. it is perfectly alright to ban books because of one statement or photo that may be considered offensive to some whose prurient interest is aroused really badly and significantly.
____



35. One of the earliest standards of obscenity in the United States and England was:
a. Areogapatica, b. The Roth Test, c. the Hicklin Test, d. the Miller Test.
____

36. The rule or “test” which states obscenity can be defined by asking “whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest” is:
a. the Miller Test,
b. b. the Roth Test,
c. c. the Hicklin Test,
d. d. the Prurient Interest Test.

_____


37. The rule or “test” which said there is “no national standard” for obscenity and made it clear that local “community standards” could vary from place to place and that a work is legally obscene if, taken as a whole, lacks “serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value” is:
a. the Miller Test,
b. the Roth Test,
c. the Hicklin Test,
d. the Prurient Interest Test.
____

38. The Comstock Law was known as the Anti-Obscenity Act of 1873. This allowed:
a. Member of Congress to seize all material they wanted to look at before it was distributed or rule pornographic,
b. empowered postal workers to look for and banish works they considered obscene
c. the pastors of various religious groups to declare material not suitable for publication, distribution or to be seen in the eyes of God,
d. Libraries to issue warrants for the arrest of those whom they felt had written obscene materials or presented material in such a vulgar way that prurient interests would certainly rage in a community.
_____


39. In the movie “Dirty Pictures,” the photographer whose work was being questioned was?

a. Madonna
b. Sally Mann
c. Robert Mapplethorpe
d. James Woods
_____

40. Essentially, when it comes to pornographic and obscene material, the final analysis in U.S. Supreme Court rulings have said that:

a. Each separate work in collection must be reviewed for obscenity.
b. The work as a whole must be considered before being deemed obscene.
c. The “average person” and “community standards” will help determine obscenity.
d. The mayor of a town, police chief, district attorney can legally decide what the people there can see or not see.
e. All of the above
f. Only “b” and “c” are correct

_____

41. Prior restraint is

a. An act of government censorship to prevent facts or ideas that the government considers unacceptable from ever being disseminated.
b. What the government does to paparazzi photographers who cannot be controlled.
c. What should be done to talk show host like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly.
d. What some students in this class should be done to Dr. Flores when he has lectured for an hour-and-a-half and is still going strong.

_____


42. In the Pentagon Papers decision, the Supreme Court ruled that prior restraint of the news media would be permissible. Which of the following is a correct enforcement of prior restraint?

a. Prior restraint is allowed if the government can prove irreparable hard to national security would otherwise occur.
b. Prior restraint of an article for a student newspaper is allowed at the university level because the article must be check by the University provost and maybe even the president.
c. Prior restraint is allowed if the city’s mayor or mayor’s staff has not reviewed an article about a city council meeting.
d. Prior restraint is applicable about any newspaper article or TV newscast involving the military or military actions during any proclaimed war or national civic activity.



43. Of the following, which did The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and an ensuing courts case (Zeran v. America Online) in the 4th Circuit Court declare applicable to internet communications:

a. Internet service providers (ISPs) are subject to libel cases just as other publishers or print newspapers or magazines were.
b. Internet service providers (ISPs) are not to be treated as publishers and held liable for the content6 of the messages they carry.
c. Internet service providers are free to screen out material they consider obscene or otherwise inappropriate without assuming liability for everything they do not screen out.
d. Online services are exempt from liability under state libel laws for any message posted by a third party.
e. All of the above are correct.
f. Only b, c and d are correct.

_____

44. To win a regular libel suit a plaintiff (the person suing) must prove all of the following except

a. Defamation
b. Identification
c. Publication
d. Appropriation

_____


45. In cases involving a libel suit of public concern the plaintiff must also prove

a. Distrust of the media and paparazzi
b. Fault and actual damages
c. Intrusion and sedation
d. Embarrassment and Outrage


46. All of the following are defenses for libel except:

a. Truth
b. Fair Comment and Criticism
c. Privilege
d. Defamation

_____


47. All of the following constitute an invasion of privacy under media law except:

a. Intrusion into a person’s physical solitude
b. Publication of private facts, causing embarrassment
c. Placing a person before the public in a false light
d. Appropriating a person’s name or likeness for commercial exploitation (misappropriation).
e. Defamation

_____


48. The defenses the news media has against invasion of privacy lawsuits are all of the below except:

a. Newsworthiness
b. Use of public record
c. Freedom of the Press to publish anything.
d. Consent

_____


49. All of the following are parts of the Miller v. California (1973) three prong test for obscenity except:

a. Meets the criteria of the original Roth Test – the average person, applying community standards.
b. Describes sexual content in a patently offensive way as judged by the average person, applying community standards
c. A part of the story or art exhibit or magazine is totally offensive and pornographic.
d. The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

_____

50. In the Miller v. California (1973) ruling, the Supreme Court made it clear that

a. Obscenity is a community issue and federal law must be followed.
b. Local community standards may vary from place to place
c. Works that have serious value as determined by objective standards cannot be censored anywhere
d. Both b and c are correct.

_____






II. Matching: Please match the lawsuit in Column A with the correct answer on Column B. Each is worth 2 points.

Column A Column B
1. The People v. Smith______ A. Gave the U.S. Supreme Court
power to declare acts of Congress
unconstitutional.

2. Marbury v. Madison_____ B. Extended First Amendment
protection to those accused
of seditious speech.

3. Schenck v. U.S._________ C. Said that “cross burning” and
“hate speech” was a protected
First Amendment right

4. Brandenburg v. Ohio _____ D. Established prosecution must
prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”
in criminal case.

5. Near v. Minnesota _______ E. A violation of privacy occurs only when the intrusion is “highly offensive to a reasonable person.”

6. R.A.V. v. St Paul ________ F. The Supreme Court said that in all libel cases involving matters of public concern, the plaintiff must prove some degree of fault. The two levels of fault were “negligence” and “malice” in any case involving private citizens.

7. Texas v. Johnson _____ G. Established norms of obscenity as “patently offensive” and “utterly without redeeming social value.”

8. Lovell v. City of Griffin, Ga. _____ H. Liberty of the press is not confined to newspapers.

9. New York Times v. Sullivan _____ I. Flag desecration, and burning, is a protected First Amendment right,
in particular when it occurs in a political context.

10. Gertz v. Welch _____ J. Redefined Roth and Memoirs cases on obscenity and established community standards.

11. Lawrence v. Texas _____ K. The Supreme Court ruled that public officials who sue for libel or slander MUST prove “actual malice,” which was defined as publishing a “falsehood” with knowledge of its falsity, or with “reckless disregard for the truth”.

12. One Book Entitled ‘Ulysses v. U.S. _____ L. Established the “average person”, “contemporary community standards” and work “taken as a whole” standards for obscenity

13. Roth v. U.S. _____ M. Overturned a decision which said homosexual men do not have a right to privacy.


14. ‘Memoirs’ v. Massachusetts. ____ N. Overturned “the most susceptible
Person” ruling test of obscenity.


15. Miler v. California. _____ O. Established the “clear and
present danger” criteria to
freedom of speech conviction
cases.



16. Sanders v. ABC _____ P. Made it clear that “prior
restraints” to publication are
generally improper in the U.S.












III. Essay: Please answer the following essay questions briefly and succinctly. Use material covered in the lectures and text to fortify your answer. Write the answer below the question, type it on a computer or print it out or write the answer on an extra sheet of paper. Please try to use your book and do not, do not copy paste from a computer. Each is worth 5 points.


1. Citing some of the media law cases reviewed in class and remembering the discussions of the Sally Mann and Madonna books, explain the evolution of the definition of obscenity in the United States and explain why these two books are not considered to be against obscenity and pornography standards in our country.














2. Burning the United Stats flag is a sensitive issue. Cite some of the major cases involving flag desecration in the 20th century and reveal the status of flag- burning issues in our country at this time. Cite why you think it should or should not be a crime, in your own words. Refer to the First Amendment to give a complete answer.









IV. Remember: Please answer the following questions about the U.S. Supreme Court and court system in our country. This is worth 5 points.

1. How many justices are there in the U.S. Supreme Court, and how long may each justice serve?




2. Who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and when was he/she appointed?



3. Are there any women in the U.S. Supreme Court? If so, name at least one.




4. What is the name of the Supreme Court Justice who said he would retire at the end of this Supreme Court term?



5. What is the name of the first Supreme Court Justice nominee submitted by President Barack Obama?




6. How many courts of appeals are there in the United States?



7. In regards to the Supreme Court, what is a writ of certiorari and how does it work?

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Legal Issue/Case Reports Assignments and Due Dates


Below is a list of "Legal Issues/Case Report" that were assigned on the first day of class. This are individual assignments. Each student is to turn in a 2-4 page report with citations on the subject assigned. The report may be oral or can be a PowerPoint presentation. Handouts are encouraged. You must be prepared to answer questions from the class on the subject. Note: These reports come from the first-day PowerPoint lecture where we were investigating legal issues and supreme court ruling that impact media law.
(1) NY Times v. U.S., 1971 - Kristie Vela, due Monday June 22
(2) Wooley v. Maynard, 1977 (Compelled Speech) -Mary Beth Cleavlin, due Tuesday, June 23.
(3) Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969 (Symbolic Speech) - Erika Hernandez, due Tuesday, June 16.
(4) Kaelin v. Globe Communications Corp., 1998 (Libel, defamation) - Katherine Robinette, due Wednesday, June 17.
(5) Westboro Baptist Church (proposed law in Montana, SB 15, banning picketing) - Devina Arredondo, due Friday, June 19.
(6) Sheppard v. Maxwell, 1966 (Pretrial publicity) - Lisa Lane, due Wednesday, June 24.
(7) Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams (Public figures) - David Mendez, due Thursday June 25.
(8) Flag burning, right or wrong? Is it unpatriotic? - Gregory Stelfox, due Thursday, June 18.
(9) Is Freedom Absolute? Can you yell "fire!" in a crowded theatre? - Ray Hudson, due Friday, June 26.
(10) Write a story that class the mayor of ??? city a lying cheat and back it up somehow. Is it libelous? Why or Why Not? - Yamira Gonzalez-Mendiola, due Monday, June 29.
(11) Write a column, editorial, criticizing some phase of government (federal, state or local). Be touch. Is it libelous? Why or Why not? - Lance Catchings, due Tuesday, June 30.
(12) Is Advertising protected by the First Amendment? What does it mean when people say "commercial speech"? What is meant by "corporate speech"? What is an advertorial?, Sasha Rodriguez, due Wednesday, July 1.
(13)During the 1970s, the Supreme Court reviewed Frist Amendment status of college students in two important cases. Please review those cases (and others related) and report if they are still applicable. The two cases are Heady v. James (1972) and Papish v. University of Missouri Curators (1973). Also, please report what is a "free speech zone" for public universities and public schools. - Brent C. Walker, due Thursday, July 2.



On-Call Assignments and Due Dates (Revised from original syllabus)

Below are the On-Call assignments and the students who will be making the primary report. Remember, everyone in the class is expected to turn in a written (2-page, double-spaced) report on the assignment except for the students who are making the presentation on that day. The idea here is for the presenters to review the topic and than to embark in a spirited class discussion. The presenters may choose the style of presentation. PowerPoint is preferred. Remember, while preparing power points, that our projector does not illuminate brightly. Choose bright colors (gold, yellow, orange, red and not blue or dark green). Slide transparencies and handouts are also allowed. Good luck!

(1) “Hate Speech Websites: How Can They Do That?” - Lisa Lane and Kristie Vela, due Monday June 15.

(2) “Our Country’s Legacy of Freedom of the Press” - Greg Stelfox and Ray Hudson, due Tuesday, June 16.

(3) “How is social media impacting freedom of the press?” - Mary Beth Cleavelin and Katherine Robinette, due Monday, June 22.

(4) “Should Texas Have Shield Laws: Why or Why Not? Breaking News on the Issue.” - Devina Arredondo and Lance Catchings, due Friday, June 26.

(5) “Paparazzi: Do They Really Infringe on Celebrities’ Privacy?” - Erika Hernandez and Sasha Rodriguez, due Monday, June 29.


(6) “What is Pornography? Taking a look at the movies like Dirty Pictures and The People vs. Larry Flynt and books like Madonna's Sex and Sally Mann's Immediate Family.”- Yamira Gonzalez-Mendiola and David Mendez, due Tuesday, June 30.

(7) "How can the government ban cigarette advertising? Is this not a violation of free speech and the First Amendment?" by Brent C. Walker (No partner), Thursday, July 2.

Syllabus for COMM 4317 -Media Law

COMM 4317
Mass Media, the Public and the Law
Summer 2009

Dr. Manuel Flores, Associate Professor of Journalism
Texas A&M University-Kingsville
Time: 10 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. MTWTF
Room 172 Speech Building
Tel: 593-3401, or at South Texan Office: 593-3700
Email:
manuelf78407@yahoo.com or kfmcf00@tamuk.edu
Office Hours Wednesday 2-5 p.m. and by appointment



Wayne Overbeck, Major Principles of Media Law (2009 Edition), Thomson-Wadsworth.Other materials will be made available by the instructor.

COURSE DESCRIPTION: Legal and ethical limitation of mass media, relationship and interaction between the journalist, governmental regulatory agencies and the public. Prerequisite: 6 semester hours of journalism and/or radio-TV or professor approval.

COURSE OBJECTIVES
This course will focus on two specific areas of media law: 1) the limits of a free press and the balance between the right to publish and the right to privacy in a democratic society and 2) the limits of a free press and the right to a fair trial in a democratic society. While we will be discussing U.S. federal and Texas state law for the most part, we may also examine some recent foreign cases and international materials, depending on the time.


STUDENT LEARNER OUTCOMES

1. Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of historic legal cases that have impacted
U.S. media.
2. Students will be able to complete a “legal review” of a media law case.
3. The students will demonstrate knowledge of Supreme Court cases that impact media in the
United States.

All SLOs will be assessed through a comprehensive end-of-semester final exam and completion of written and oral assignments covering all the issues discussed in the course objectives.

GRADING

There will be two major tests (a mid-term and final). Each will count 25 percent on your final grade. There will also be six writing/research assignments (listed above). The average of this will count 25 percent of your final grade. Your oral “on call” class presentation as a team will be the other 25 percent. Each is worth 25 percent of your final grade. The writing/research assignments will also include a class participation grade.

ATTENDANCE

I expect you to attend class faithfully and all assignments as well as prepare for class by reading chapters in advance. In addition, please be ready to participate in class or lead a discussion in class on a legal matter, current issue or law case. I will notify you in advance when you will be "on call" to lead the class discussion. Make up exams will be scheduled on an individual basis at the discretion of the instructor. I expect you to behave professionally while in class. Professional behavior includes but is not limited to adherence to all TAMUK student discipline rules of conduct. Also, please do not log on the computer and go on MySpace or play Solitaire while a lecture is in progress. Please, also, wear proper attire, and arrive on time and prepared.

SCHEDULE OF READINGS AND DISCUSSIONS

Given the limited time for this course, we will have a lot of material to cover. As the semester progresses, therefore, I may adjust the amount of time given to certain readings or drop some altogether. We may also have some guest speakers; this may alter the schedule of readings and discussions. In any occasion, you are responsible for both lecture material and the material covered in the book. And, yes, you will need to buy the book for this class.

The following class discussions have been planned:

(1) “Hate Speech Websites: How Can They Do That?” - Lisa Lane and Kristie Vela, due Monday June 15.
(2) “Our Country’s Legacy of Freedom of the Press” - Greg Stelfox and Ray Hudson, due Thursday June 18.
(3) “How is social media impacting freedom of the press?” - Mary Beth Cleavelin and Katherine Robinette, due Tuesday, June 23.
(4) “Should Texas Have Shield Laws: Why or Why Not? Breaking News on the Issue.” - Devina Arredondo and Lance Catchings, due Thursday, June 25.
(5) “Paparazzi: Do They Really Infringe on Celebrities’ Privacy?” - Erika Hernandez and Sasha Rodriguez, due Monday, June 29.
(6) “What is Pornography? Taking a look at the movies like Dirty Pictures and The People vs. Larry Flynt and books like Madonna's Sex and Sally Mann's Immediate Family.”- Yamira Gonzalez-Mendiola and David Mendez, due Tuesday, June 30.

The class will be paired-off into presentation teams. We will determine these groups early in the class and, while each topic will be a class discussion, the presentation teams will lead the discussion. In addition, each student will make a presentation on a legal case or issue.

WEEKLY ASSIGNMENTS
*Note schedule subject to change for guest speakers and professor travel.

Monday, June 8: Chapter 1 – The American Legal System
Tuesday, June 9: Chapter 2 – The Legacy of Freedom (short class)
Wednesday, June 10: Chapter 3 - Modern Prior Restraints
Thursday, June 11: Chapter 4 – Libel and Slander
Friday, June 12: Chapter 5 – The Right to Privacy – First report due
Monday, June 15: Chapter 10 – Obscenity and the Law. (Class discussion. First On-Call Team
“Hate Speech Websites: How Can They Do That?” - Lisa Lane and Kristie Vela will present).
Tuesday, June 16: Catch up. Second Report due (Class discussion. Second On-Call Team "Our Country’s Legacy of Freedom of the Press” - Greg Stelfox and Ray Hudson will present), also presentation on Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969 (Symbolic Speech) by Erika Hernandez.
Wednesday, June 17: CineFlores “Dirty Pictures” or “People v. Larry Flynt.” Also presentaton on Kaelin v. Globe Communications Corp., 1998 (Libel, defamation) by Katherine Robinette.
Thursday, June 18: Review for Test 1 (take home), also presentation on Flag burning, right or wrong? Is it unpatriotic? by Gregory Stelfox.
Friday, June 19: Chapter 8 – Newsgather’s Privilege – Chapter 7 – Fair Trial/Free Press
Conflicts, also presentation on Westboro Baptist Church (proposed law in Montana, SB 15, banning picketing) by Devina Arredondo.
Monday, June 22: Chapter 9 – Guest Speaker (write report on guess speaker), also presentation of NY Times v. U.S., 1971 - Kristie Vela, also (Class discussion. Third On-Call Team “How is social media impacting freedom of the press?” - Mary Beth Cleavelin and Katherine Robinette will present).
Tuesday, June 23: Freedom of Information (Texas Open Meetings Law). Do an FOI Request.
Also presentation of Wooley v. Maynard, 1977 (Compelled Speech) by Mary Beth Cleavlin.
Wednesday, June 24: Chapter 11 – Regulation and the Electronic Media. also presentation on Sheppard v. Maxwell, 1966 (Pretrial publicity) by Lisa Lane.
Thursday, June 25: Chapter 12 – Media Ownership Issues, also presentation on Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams (Public figures) by David Mendez.
Friday, June 26: Chapter 13 – Advertising and the Law. Fourth On-Call Report Due "Should Texas Have Shield Laws: Why or Why Not? Breaking News on the Issue" by Devina Arredondo and Lance Catchings, also presentation on Is Freedom Absolute? Can you yell "fire!" in a crowded theatre? by Ray Hudson.
Monday, June 29: Chapter 14 – Freedom of the Student Press, Chapter 6 – Copyrights and
Trademarks (File Sharing on computers) . Fifth On-Call Team “Paparazzi: Do They Really Infringe on Celebrities’ Privacy?” - Erika Hernandez and Sasha Rodriguez will present, also presentation on "Write a story that says the mayor of ??? city a lying cheat and back it up somehow. Is it libelous? Why or Why Not?" by Yamira Gonzalez-Mendiola.
Tuesday, June 30: Guest speaker Do an FOI Reports Catch up, also presentation. Sixth On-Call Team will present “What is Pornography? Taking a look at the movies like Dirty Pictures and The People vs. Larry Flynt and books like Madonna's Sex and Sally Mann's Immediate Family.”- Yamira Gonzalez-Mendiola and David Mendez, also "Write a column, editorial, criticizing some phase of government (federal, state or local). Be tough. Is it libelous? Why or Why not?" by Lance Catching. Final test take home handed out.
Wednesday, July 1- Do an FOI Reports Catch up, also presentation on "Is Advertising protected by the First Amendment? What does it mean when people say "commercial speech"? What is meant by "corporate speech"? What is an advertorial? by Sasha Rodriguez.
Thursday, July 2: Catch up/speaker/ and also presentation on How can the government ban cigarette advertising? Is this not a violation of free speech and the First Amendment? by Brent C. Walker. Also, Brent will report on Heady V. James and Papish v. University of Missouri Curators and free speech zones.
Friday, July 3: Catch up/Final Exam






TAMUK Policy

Disability statement:
Students with disabilities, including learning disabilities, who wish to request accommodations in class, should register with the Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) early in the semester so that appropriate arrangements may be made. In accordance with federal laws, a student requesting special accommodations must provide documentation of their disability to the SSD coordinator. For more information, call (361) 593-3024 or visit Life Services and Wellness.

Academic misconduct statement:
You are expected to practice academic honesty in every aspect of this course and all other courses. Make sure you are familiar with your Student Handbook, especially the section on academic misconduct. Students who engage in academic misconduct are subject to university disciplinary procedures.

Forms of academic dishonesty:
1) Cheating: deception in which a student misrepresents that he/she has mastered information on an academic exercise that he/she has not mastered; giving or receiving aid unauthorized by the instructor on assignments or examinations.
2) Academic misconduct: tampering with grades or taking part in obtaining or distributing any part of a scheduled test.
3) Fabrication: use of invented information or falsified research.
4) Plagiarism: unacknowledged quotation and/or paraphrase of someone else's words, ideas, or data as one's own in work submitted for credit. Failure to identify information or essays from the Internet and submitting them as one's own work also constitutes plagiarism.
5) Please be aware that the University subscribes to the Turnitin plagiarism detection service. Your paper may be submitted to this service at the discretion of the instructor.

Non-academic misconduct:
The university respects the rights of instructors to teach and students to learn. Maintenance of these rights requires campus conditions that do not impede their exercise. Campus behavior that interferes with either
1) The instructor's ability to conduct the class
2) The inability of other students to profit from the instructional program, or
3) Campus behavior that interferes with the rights of others will not be tolerated.
An individual engaging in such disruptive behavior may be subject to disciplinary action. Such incidents will be adjudicated by the Dean of Students under non-academic procedures.

Sexual misconduct:
Sexual harassment of students and employers at Texas A&M University-Kingsville is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Any member of the university community violating this policy will be subject to disciplinary action.

Six-drop policy:
“If you are a freshman and you are enrolled in college for the first time Fall 2007 or later following graduation from high school, you are affected by this law. Senate Bill 1231 limits the number of courses that you may drop during your undergraduate career to six drops. If you need additional information on Senate Bill 1231 and how it affects you, please contact the Registrar’s Office in College Hall, Room 105.”

END OF THE COURSE!
HAVE A GREAT REST OF THE SUMMER!


Welcome to TAMUK Media Law

Welcome to Texas A&M University-Kingsville Communication 4317 Media Law Blog. This blog is designed to help students in the class navigate through the course being taught Summer I 2009. Assignments, comments on assignments and some communication within the class will be administered through this blog. Please remember this blog is primarily students enrolled in Texas A&M University-Kingsville and the information posted here is of an academic nature and may not be used without the expressed written consent of the university, the professor teaching the course and the student who posted material.